RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00043
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect his service in Vietnam.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He served in Vietnam and was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM) as reflected on his DD Form 214.
In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214 and information extracted from the internet regarding combat license plates in the state of Ohio.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicants DD Form 214, reflects that he served in Indochina and has 1 year, 5 months and 16 days of Foreign service.
______________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial. DPAPP states that a review of the applicants master personnel records and documentation submitted failed to substantiate Foreign Service time in Vietnam.
The complete AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 17 February 2013 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit C). As of this date, this office has not received a response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-00043 in Executive Session on 27 August 2013 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Panel Chair
Member
Member
The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-00043 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 26 December 2012, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 8 February 2013.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 February 2013
Panel Chair
2
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05624
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05624 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to reflect he was awarded the following awards: a. Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). While we note that AFPC/DPAPP verified the applicants foreign service in Thailand, said service took place after the inclusive dates of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05624
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05624 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to reflect he was awarded the following awards: a. Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). While we note that AFPC/DPAPP verified the applicants foreign service in Thailand, said service took place after the inclusive dates of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04024
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04024 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he went temporary duty (TDY) to Camron [sic] Bay, South Vietnam for 53 days and that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). The applicants complete submission is at Exhibit A. We took notice of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05419
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05419 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial for foreign service in Vietnam. Insufficient relevant...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01208
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01208 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect his service in Vietnam. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His DD Form 214 reflects...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00337
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00337 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to reflect his service in Vietnam. The applicants complete submission is at Exhibit A. While assigned to Clark Air Base, he performed a TDY assignment to Taiwan; however, the exact amount of time served in Taiwan could not be...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04655
DPAPP states that after a review of his master personnel records and submitteddocumentation, they were unable to find any documentation to substantiate his Foreign Service time was in Vietnam. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Forcerelating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he served bootson-the-ground in the Republic of Vietnam in 1968. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-04655 in Executive...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01007
_______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The VSM, VCM, and his service time in the Republic of Vietnam are not reflected in his records. The amount of Foreign Service time reflected on his DD Form 214 is correct, therefore, a correction is not needed. The Board notes the Air Force office of primary responsibility confirms the applicant was TDY to the Republic of Vietnam.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05672
In a letter to the applicant dated 4 February 2014, AFPC/DPAPP advised the applicant that the amount of Foreign Service time reflected on his DD Form 214 is correct. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 4 February 2014. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 February 2014.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05692
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial, indicating the applicants master personnel records do not contain information that reflects his service in the Dominican Republic. While we note the applicant provided a copy of temporary duty orders reflecting an itinerary to the Dominican Republic, these orders alone are not sufficient to substantiate that he traveled to the Dominican Republic as he contends. However, we...